Europhonix

Aims     Sessions     Feedback     Comment




Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

Week 5

Week 6

Week 7

Mon 9th December           Brockhill Park School           (session six )

I began today's session by playing back to the students the recordings that they had made the previous week. We gave marks out of ten for each piece, with I think Hannah's classical piece getting the top mark, and then I played them their compositions with the sound of Jermaine (from Hartsdown)'s 'radio' improvisation in the background to give the impression of the radio tuning in and out of the stations. We noticed that when we did this it didn't sound quite right. I showed the students that this was because, when compared to the radio piece, their recordings were of a cleaner quality. The remedy was simple: we just had to lessen the quality of their recordings so that they sounded more like they would on the radio. After this we agreed that the sounds married much better. Next I showed them how I had put both their recordings and Jermaine's 'radio' into their car-journey composition. They recommended a few changes, but on the whole thought it was on the right lines.

As there were some students who still wanted to record some pieces for this part of the composition I let them do this. Ainsleigh, Som and Hayley had a rap-style piece, Hannah had a weather forecast and Kallum had a skateboard rap, which he later confessed was from a computer game and so, as it wasn't original, we discarded it.

This took us up to break as the rap-style piece was very unrehearsed. (In fact, a complete mess!)

After break I said to the students that today I wanted to begin thinking about 'Away' music. I asked them if they could remember what they had said concerning the quality of 'Away' sounds, from the first session. They remembered quite a lot, remembering the lack of routine and also that the sounds would very possibly be new sounds. I talked about how as a composer I felt that I had to always consider my listening audience. I said that I often found this quite difficult as often I would be working on a composition for months and yet needed to know that it would work with an audience at their first listening. If they were going to work on a piece of music creating new sounds for their audience, to represent the feeling of away, then they maybe should also think about what new sounds sounded like. I asked them if every sound was going to be new to them how far would they have to come from. Matthew replied, "space". I said that we were going to go for a walk and they were to listen to the sounds, but not as humans, but as aliens. They were to hear sounds, listen to them and then describe them in writing. Since they were aliens they would not be able to name the sounds but would have to resort to other methods to remember them. I then gave them a few examples (some bird impressions) and asked them how we could describe the sounds. They distinguished between the pitch, the volume, the quality of the sound, how often it occurred, and also graphically representing it. When I was sure the group had grasped the concept I gave them a sheet of paper each and asked them to write down their classifications. I then told them that not only were they now aliens but that they were aliens who could not speak and I forbade any talking of any kind for the whole of the planned trip. They were to follow Tim Vinall, stop when he stopped, and simply listen and note down what they heard.

To begin with not every student was happy with the idea of going outside, or walking, or not talking, and gave excuses of various illnesses, but I told them that they didn't have an option. We were going!

To begin with the group divided themselves between those that were keen(ish) and those who most definitely were not keen and thought that the whole exercise was unnecessary. Some of the unconvinced students included, Zack, Louise, and Hayley (who was in a right mood about the whole idea). Very interestingly, I saw all these students transform into listeners on the journey when they got used to the discipline of being quiet. Our route was around the back of the school, the school farm and also around the lake of Brockhill Park. I think it was about ten minutes or so into the Brockhill Park that I noticed that all the students were now into the idea. At various points in the journey, when the students were stopped, I asked them questions about what they could hear and also suggested ways for them to listen in particular spots. My most common question was what was the loudest sound they could hear as in most cases this was the traffic from the road (about half a mile away) and I wanted them to notice this with regard to what I had planned for the afternoon. We must have been out for an hour and a half in total as when we returned it was time for lunch, and Fiona had arrived (to video the afternoon session).

After lunch I asked the students what they had thought about their walk. The feedback was good, and this lead to a discussion about the difference between hearing and listening. We decided that the difference was that listening was a more focused activity that required the listener to "pay attention". I said that, for me, whenever I just heard sounds I heard them horizontally, and then went to the board to explain what I meant. I asked them to tell me some of the sounds that they had heard in the park. They mentioned, duck, moorhen, river and leaves. I said that when I just heard these sounds I would notice them one at a time and sequentially. I then said that whenever I listened to the sounds, however, I no longer heard sounds horizontally (or sequentially) but vertically, i.e., I heard them in relationship to each other. Using the four sounds I then asked the students to tell me how the sounds related to each other in terms of length, pitch, volume and so on.

At a certain part on our walk around the park I got the students to write down everything they heard whilst congregated together between two fixed points of time. At this point in the afternoon I now asked them to count up how many sounds they had written between this time. Kallum had the most, and so we wrote up his sounds on the board. Then others chipped in with their own records to supplement the list. I drew special attention to Hayley and Som's list. They had mentioned many sounds actually made by the group themselves, whereas Kallum's didn't mention any of the student derived sounds. I said that I found this very interesting as I got the impression that most people do not consider their own sound contributions (only others). To make the point I asked them what were the loudest sounds that they heard. They replied, traffic, airplanes, helicopter and train. I said that it was perhaps interestingly that these were also human-made sounds. I also asked the students to tell me which were the loudest sounds and which were the continuous sounds. Again, traffic, trains, airplanes and helicopter came up. I then drew a time chart on the board and asked the students which sounds would have been there 500 years ago (which was everything except the list above) and then asked them to tell me when these other sounds became introduced into our sound environment. We found that they had come on the scene within the last 120 or so years. I said that I thought it was interesting that almost all the natural sounds were short, quiet sounds and interspersed with long silent gaps, whereas our modern human-made sounds were noisy and continuous.

After all this it was the end of the day. For the last half hour one of the dance tutors came into the room to listen. Afterwards Callum told Tim that although it was not his first time in the park it was the first time that he had noticed the park and for him it had been like a first experience. Jackie Mortimer also told me that after school Zack had popped into her room and exclaimed that there was no silence to be heard anywhere, not in the park, and certainly not in the school! Tim was greatly impressed with how the students had transformed during the afternoon session.

Before going I told Tim and Jackie that I wanted them to write up their thoughts on the project, what they had thought about the project, whether they thought it had had any educational value and if so what, whether they think the students had got anything out of it and if so what, how they intended to move on from here and what in the project had been useful for them, if anything.

Tim was much better today at being around.



Wed 11th December           Hartsdown Technology College           (session six )

When I arrived Mary came up and told me that she had written some words for a song in preparation for today's session. We had a new student in for the session; well, at least it was the first time I'd seen him: his name was Richard Gregory.

When I had all the students assembled I asked them whether they wanted to continue on last week's piece or work with Mary's words. The general consensus was the latter, so I asked Mary to read what she had written to the rest of the students. We then discussed how we might work with the words. Jarryd suggested that Mary could simply speak the words over our to be composed music. I asked Mary to read a verse and then asked the metalophone group to improvise a musical response. This worked really well and so we tried it with some other groups. For this, Andrew, Holly, Jess and Kylie wanted to switch from their usual instruments to using the electronic keyboards. I said they could, and they set up the keyboards. I let each keyboard player have a chance to respond to Mary's words and then asked our two drummers: Lawrence and Kieron to have a go. This they found very difficult, and I tried different exercises with them to stretch their playing (and thinking). Their first reaction was to play a normal drum rhythm in response to Mary's words. I asked them to think texturally and not rhythmically. They found this difficult so I set the various difficult tasks such as playing whatever they wanted but not being allowed to actually hit the drums with the sticks. After this I also asked them to do the exercise but added the complication that they now they also weren't allowed to play the 'normal' parts of the drums or cymbals. Lawrence hated being asked to do this. Kieron found it difficult, but in fact he rose to the challenge and it opened up his drumming, with the result that by lunchtime he was playing better than ever. (Lawrence, on the other hand, later on swapped instruments with bassist, Karl.) From this, I said that we would try out some conductions with some volunteer students organising how and when the students would play their music or when Mary would say her words. Alisha had a go and then Jarryd and then Kieron. I then asked the students what they thought of all our music experimenting. The general consensus was that it was too way out and it wasn't the sort of music that they listen to. I asked them what they thought we would have to do to make the music better, and they suggested having some main musical focus which they could then latch onto and improvise around (instead of perhaps lacking any real direction). I said that we would have a go at this, after break, but before they went I played them the recording of their work the week previous. They thought this was very good.

After break we discussed how we could use what we had learnt in the morning and create a composition using Mary's words. As she had five verses and we had four groups of musicians we decided to alternate in sections between musicians and verse. Mary read out the first verse and from that we decided which instruments had the most fitting sound to smoothly link with her words.

The first group to play was Justin on piano, the metalophones and Karl, Joe and Kieron on a bit of percussion. We rehearsed this a few times and it sounded well, and so we listened to Mary's second verse and worked out which instruments and style of playing fitted with the words. As her words mentioned remembering a journey, Lawrence, Kieron and Jermaine had ideas for a faster riff to give that travelling feeling. When this section was completed we ran the composition from the beginning and similarly carried on finding music for the remaining sections. We just about finished the composition by the time lunchtime arrived.

After lunch we multitracked the piece, recording the composition in sections, starting with Justin on piano and then working through. Bit by bit we worked through the piece giving everybody two chances to record their particular music contribution. The students worked well at this, at least for the first hour but then some students (namely Karl, Jermaine, Joe and Kieron) lost their focus and this slowed progress down. As a result we didn't get everything recorded, but we can do this next week. (Still to do: Jermaine's guitar breathing, Karl and Joe's percussion for the keyboard tune, Danny's guitar solo over the metalophones 'gold' section, the keyboards' pointillist section and Mary's words. On this note we had discussed recording her speaking and also recording her whispering the words and having them being played at the same time. We had also thought of having her say the words in French, and perhaps have the English voice in the left ear and the French translation in the right ear.)

After the session I asked Janis Morgan, the class teacher, how she thought the session went. I try to speak her at the end of every session but there is never a lot of time before she has to deal with a student. As usual she was appalled at the student's behaviour, especially Joe, Karl and Kieron's. She is concerned that the antics of a few are hindering the progress of the majority, not just in this workshop but in her classes in general. Nevertheless we did agree that the students were concentrating much more than they were at the beginning of the project and were coming up with better musical ideas. Today's composition was very musical, much more mature in concept and execution and not something simply directly related to the music of Nirvana or Slipknot.

I asked her to write down her thoughts on the project as I had done with Tim and Jackie at Brockhill. She said she would do this for next Thursday.

Mary's words:

I remember the journey
And everything we passed
I remember the journey
The week went too fast

I remember last summer
When I went away
I remember last summer
Like it was yesterday

I remember the sand
And it shone bright gold
I remember the sand
Its memory I hold

I remember the tune
That we both danced
I remember the tune
My head in a trance



Fri 13th December           Whitstable Community College           (session six )

Today was only a half-day. Tom Jarrett rang the night before to say that St Nicholas' Special School from Canterbury were visiting the school in the afternoon and my students were involved as part of their citizenship qualification. Tom also told me that next week would also be a half day as the head teacher had decreed that, as it was the last day of term, everyone could have the afternoon off.

I arrived at the school and immediately went to the conference room, found out that the caretaker was preparing the room and then went down to the music room to find Tom to confirm where I was meant to be. In one of the music rooms I met Fiona with her video camera. Eventually the students came up to the room and brought up their instruments.

I began the session by recording Rachel reading the words of Mary (of Hartsdown)'s song. I'd meant to record them when at Harstdown but that had not happened. I will ask Mary to record them herself next week, but wanted a version of the words to help with preparing the composition for Peter Jenkinson. Rachel agreed to say the words (as long as she didn't have to sing anything!). It's strange: she gives every appearance of being a good student but is so reluctant to muster any energy to do anything musical, it's unbelievable. She read the words, but for the rest of the session did not want to be involved, just spectate, which I let her do. (It's not worth the bother....)

I then spent some time playing back the students the various elements of what they recorded last week. I let them listen to each sound individually and also demonstrated some simple computer manipulation techniques such as reversing, resampling and fast Fourier transforming (!). As they began to understand what was possible the students would ask me to manipulate the sounds in various ways. Eventually, after we had heard all the sounds, I played them their whole composition as it was recorded last week. I asked them what they thought and they said that they needed to rerecord the rhythmic pattern. Owen (the drummer) had a particular complaint about how the group was playing, and I let him suggest how they might rehearse and practise the rhythm. Recording a good take was very difficult, but we eventually managed it by the end of third period, when Elizabeth had to go to dress up as Father Christmas. After this I played them the version of their recording that I had been working on since my last visit to the school. This included all the sounds they had recorded. After listening, we discussed the composition. The students thought it was good and faithful to their work, but thought it needed a little something in the middle. Ross suggested using backward recordings of voices, and so we tried out his idea using a sampler that I had brought with me, and then I recorded everyone saying/whispering phrases into the microphone for me to reverse and add into the composition for next week. Rachel left at 12:30, as she had to go to the doctors.

My teacher for the session was to be one of the music teachers; however, Tom sent her home as she was ill. Instead Suzanne the music assistant took her place. She was there up until break. After break she said that Tom had asked her to buy a CD for him and so she wouldn't be there. I think she showed at the end of the morning, but I didn't notice her. This teacher input hasn't really worked at this school. In session two, Sue Merrells was my teacher and in session three it was Sonia Connell. Both these teachers were great. They were there the whole time, were interested, took part with the students, and looked after me. This hasn't happened again.

After the session, I asked Tom to prepare his written evaluation for next week. He then asked if next week our photographer (Laura) could take some photos of students and staff together in the workshops. I was a bit taken aback by this, especially as the staff input has been so poor. (It would be nice to see some staff there, whether or not there's a camera!) He said that it would be good if the school got some photographs so they could send a couple to the newspapers. "It would be good if we got something out of it", he said. I told him that if staff were there taking part with the students then they would be photographed but if they were out buying CDs or having laptop lessons then, of course, that couldn't happen. He said he understood what I was saying.

Afterwards I met the head teacher wandering around the school. He told me he had heard that the project was going well, and that the school was applying for an Artsmark Award. They had been advised that they might get a 'Silver', and it was his belief that this would greatly help the arts in the school. I asked him, "how?" He said that it would encourage more artistic children to come to the school. I am sick and tired of this approach to the arts, that it is for the so called talented. Even in this school, amongst my group of students, it is the so-called underachievers who are getting the most out of the project and are making the most headway. I know that all these kids need is the time to hang out in a creative environment and get the chance to play and they will be able to open up this side of their characters.